| |
Grading Criteria for Wikis:
Page history last edited by stephanie howell 1 yr ago
Grading Criteria for Wikies
From Wikitechbook--the student-developed, technology textbook
Step 1: Wiki editing and team planning
- Meet with your team and make formatting, wording, and content changes to existing assigned pages.
- Check all the current links to determine if they work or if they are effective, up-to-date links that contribute to the subject. Remove links you feel do not add to the content effectively.
- If there is no previous work done, develop a page and a collaborative beginning paragraph based on several good resources.
- Be sure to document any references used to make content changes.
- With your team, develop a typed plan of action for what you feel you need to contribute to our Wikitechbook. Make sure that the plan includes each person in the wiki writing team. On PBwiki, two people can't edit the same page at the same time. To avoid not being able to edit your page create a page for each team member where you can save all the stuff you find.
- Make your individual pages.
- Turn in stapled together:
- A hard copy of changes you made to existing pages and highlight what changes you made.
- A copy of your proposed plan:
Step 2: Individual Wiki Development
Step 3: Wiki editing and team planning
Step 4: Team presentation
- Present to the class (Discuss your content and show one interesting clip or site.)
Grading criteria for Wiki contribution
|
Each step of the Wiki is On-time
|
Neat Effective Professional
|
Includes all requirements,
per person
|
Linked to website
|
Spelling/Grammar
Less than 3 errors
|
Grade
|
|
Each step of the wiki and log showing editing, searching, and writing
|
-clarity of writing consistent voice and formatting
|
-75 words, link video, blog, wiki new page, & website, log of time, test question, plugin or gadget
|
|
|
|
Rubric for final grade for wiki project
-
Exemplary work: highly creative, novel, skillful, clear communication, reasoning based on solid understanding, a model I would share
-
Good work: competent understanding and thoroughness except with occasional lapses and unclear reasoning or insufficient evidence
-
Needs improvement: shows some evidence of understanding, not thorough, frequent lapses in clarity, misconceptions, or item missing
-
Seriously lacking: Missing multiple items or not following directions, excessive spelling errors and lack of professional appeal
-
Not evident: is work that shows no attempt orrely re-copying of information
|
Exemplary: 40-36
|
Good Work: 35-32
|
Needs Improvement: 31-28
|
Seriously Lacks: 27-24
|
Not Evident
|
|
All components complete, on time, all links work, no excessive errors or unattractive or non-working cells.
|
All components complete, most links work, and no excessive errors or problem cells
|
Some parts incomplete, problems with several links, or several pages with spelling problems
|
Many components lacking, major problems with excessive errors or cells
|
Website unfinished or will not open
|
Subtopics and Links
Outside Resources
Grading Criteria for Wikis:
|
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.